How forward-thinking housing companies can prioritize spend in 2027
There was a time when “tightening the budget” often meant cutting quickly and broadly. Pause hiring. Reduce marketing. Delay investments. Pull back until market conditions improve.
But after several years of instability, companies have learned survival is not just about reducing expenses. Protecting the parts of the business that create long-term strength while becoming more disciplined everywhere else is a distinction defining the way many builders, remodelers, and associate members are approaching 2027 budgeting conversations.
Businesses are forecasting more conservatively, watching pipelines more closely, building contingency into budgets, and paying sharper attention to cash flow. At the same time, many are continuing to invest intentionally in people, technology, customer experience, visibility, and operational systems that position them competitively long after a difficult cycle passes. That’s why the conversation is no longer centered on whether spending should shrink. The better question is where investment matters most—and which cuts might ultimately cost companies more in the long run.
The companies navigating this process most effectively are often the ones resisting emotional decision-making. Rather than building budgets around best-case optimism or worst-case fear, many are operating somewhere in the middle: cautious, disciplined, and highly scenario-oriented.
That balancing act is forcing many leadership teams to evaluate “overall efficiencies in every category of the business,” with a sharper eye than in years past, says Emily Thull of McDonald Remodeling, Inc. “Are the subscriptions/monthly expenses we are paying necessary? Are there better systems available to support our process/employees?”

That reinforces a point not to be overlooked: Smart companies are not necessarily avoiding spending, but they are asking better questions about it. What actually drives growth and conversions? Which investments create long-term stability? Where are margins leaking? Which systems support scalability, and which exist because “that’s how we’ve always done it”?
This process also requires recognizing that not every category should be treated equally during tighter cycles. While some operational spending may be reduced or reevaluated, certain funds are difficult to compromise.
For instance, people-related investments remain high on the list of protected priorities. Thull says positive culture, employee benefits, training, fair compensation, transparency in business goals, and flexibility are all critical to safeguard. Staffing instability is expensive. Losing experienced employees creates ripple effects across production, communication, morale, customer experience, and hiring. Many companies, for myriad reasons, spend years rebuilding teams and are reluctant to repeat that cycle unnecessarily.
The same philosophy is increasingly affecting conversations around marketing and visibility. Thull adds, “Marketing may seem like an ‘unnecessary expense’ when trying to balance everything, but it is one of the most important things to invest in during uncertain times.”
The instinct to reduce visibility during slower or more cautious markets is understandable—but often shortsighted, says Katelyn Bloomquist, senior director of marketing and communications at Housing First Minnesota. “Marketing is often one of the first things companies cut during uncertainty, but visibility matters even more in a cautious market,” she says. “If consumers stop seeing you, they’re going to stop considering you.”
The most holistic strategies tend to layer multiple forms of visibility: digital advertising, social media content, editorial placement, home tour participation, public relations, customer experience, and consistent brand messaging repeated over time. In housing especially, buying cycles are long, emotional, and heavily research-driven. Builders, remodelers, and suppliers are rarely competing for impulse decisions.
“In housing, the sales run is lengthy,” Bloomquist says. “The companies seeing results in 2027 are going to benefit from marketing investments they made six, nine, or even 12 months earlier. A strategic marketing plan keeps brands visible during longer decision-making periods and positions companies for growth when the market stabilizes.”
Technology is becoming part of that discipline as well. Many companies are investing more intentionally in tools that improve operational efficiency, communication, forecasting, estimating, and project management. AI, CRM systems, automation tools, estimating software, and workflow platforms are increasingly being evaluated less as experimental upgrades and more as infrastructure investments tied directly to productivity, scalability and efficiency.
There is no universal formula for building a successful budget—but the best ones are built around identity, not tools or line items alone. The budgeting process is forcing companies to clarify who they are, what kind of business they want to build, and which investments support that direction. In many cases, leadership teams are using the process as an opportunity to challenge outdated assumptions and eliminate spending habits that no longer align with company goals. In many ways, budgeting season should function as a strategic “reset”—a chance to build healthier, more resilient businesses for the future.















